Translation
Quality Index
Turn multilingual quality from opinion into evidence. Smart LQA, defined quality criteria and expert review show where quality is failing, why, and which controls fix it across languages, teams and content streams.
Quality Index
Performance Monitoring
Quality Processes
Governance
LQA
As multilingual programs grow, quality usually drifts gradually rather than failing in one obvious moment. The same problems return because reviewers, suppliers and internal teams are not working to one measurable standard — feedback becomes subjective, terminology drifts across suppliers and releases, and fluent output can still hide serious meaning or terminology errors.
Corrections often do not improve the next project either: feedback stays in emails and tracked files instead of becoming structured knowledge and preventive controls. Janus Worldwide shows where quality is failing, why it is happening, and which controls will improve the next release.
Intended use, audience, language pair, subject matter, current supplier model, review criteria, reference assets, recurring issues and the consequences of an error.
A structured risk summary, evidence of recurring issue patterns, an assessment of current controls and a recommended route to stable, measurable quality.
Ongoing quality measurement applied consistently across languages, suppliers and content streams, producing comparable data instead of isolated spot checks.
A shared standard for evaluating and comparing supplier quality, replacing subjective feedback with measurable performance data.
Centralized terminology ownership and enforcement, so product names, technical terms and approved claims stay consistent as suppliers, teams and releases change.
Defined criteria for accuracy, terminology and fluency applied consistently, so feedback is structured and actionable rather than a matter of reviewer preference.
Recurring issue patterns are turned into preventive controls and reusable language assets, not left in emails and tracked-change files.
Janus can evaluate content and processes independently of who currently produces the translation, giving an objective view of where quality actually stands.
Global retail enterprise.
Translation quality varied significantly across five regional suppliers, with no shared standard to compare performance or explain recurring customer-facing errors.
Independent Smart LQA review across all suppliers, centralized terminology governance, and a shared quality scorecard applied uniformly going forward.
Quality became measurable and comparable across all suppliers, with recurring terminology errors resolved through centralized governance.
Your project will be done quickly and professionaly